Woman bites off rapist's penis

Now that's what I call taking a bite out of crime.

Good for her to have the presence of mind.

in the same situation, would you think clearly enough to go for an artery or would you go for any extremity?

I say bravo to anyone who has the courage to fight off their attacker, and I say bravo without further qualification, I say Bravo, and I repeat Bravo!

The man was arrested in the accident and emergency section of the local hospital where doctors managed to reattach his member and say they are not sure if it will ever regain full functionality.

"...doctors managed to reattach his member..."
This is a rare case of rape where I would argue that she should have swallowed.

Karl— - How about this???

Or put it down the garbage disposal and let in run for several minutes.

Ok why would you stick your winner in the mouth of someone that you are assaulting. moron!

she should have kept it as a souvanir!

Yuck a souvenir.

Nah... giving it back shows the cops it was self defense, not malice.

Though I would have been tempted to "let" the cat play with it for awhile.

Cartooncat - Yeah, I would be concerned about salmonella or food poisoning!

Cartooncat- Thanks for a fun article!!!!

in the same situation, would you think clearly enough to go for an artery or would you go for any extremity?

I'd go for the offending member!

in the same situation, would you think clearly enough to go for an artery or would you go for any extremity?

it wasnt an either/or scenario. it would have been a nice touch if she'd killed him, is all.

Nah... If she'd killed him, she'd be up on charges. Now, she's got self-defense... AND he's the new poster boy for "No means NO."

lethal force is permissably used as self-defense against rape, kidnapping, and certain other enumerated inherently dangerous crimes. check out the rules in your jurisdiction, and think about it. rapists and would-be victims alike should be aware of this, to increase the deterrant affect.

I guess she got her cock-tail.

A quick mostly painless bleed out death, or an agony of being.... hehe Dismembered?( i couldn't pass that up!)

Even tho he had it re attached, it will probably never work the same. Plus he's going to prison. I think the SOB will suffer pretty good.

Had she infact bit into an artery with enough pressure to cause fatality would have been fine by me, but the fact remains, even though she would have had the defense of "self defense" she still most likely would have atleast had a wrongful death civil suit, if not a legal preceeding. Even tho she'd beat the wrap, she'd have to relive the experience in court. And nothing compares to having to relive the most painful moment of your life in the public eye, over and over, scrutinized by lawyers.

Also had she killed him, it would be on her conscience, and that might be difficult to deal with as well. I think she handled the situation pretty well under the cercumstances.

You said it would have been nice if she got the femoral artery, so I asked, in the situation, would you have the pressence of mind to go for an artery, or would you go for the thing right in front of your face?

Eddie-Yep, his love life will never be the same with the re=attachment and prison, both will be a new life indeed.

go for the thing right in front of your face?

Swallowed then digested, it will come as a fecal matter. There goes your evidence.

LOL no doubt Holly!

This guy is gonna be real popular in prison. I'll bet right now he's wishing he'd just stayed home alone and watched adult videos.

Good for her.

stubby come here! Oh hell i didn't! I did!

Stubby, I love it! I guess he can't accurately be called a pr*ck anymore!

Fortunately he might have a future career as somebody's girlfriend.

Or Justice severed. Men should be careful to stick it in the right place and no harm will be done.

remember the case in chicago in the 1950s where a guy took like 10 nursing students hostage, and killed them one by one in the other room, away from the others, and none of them even tried to escape, or fight back? i think one survived by hiding under a bed. fear does unbelievable things to people, and i think women are too socialized to respect and appreciate male power, and to underestimate their own physical strength. 10 women could have certainly overpowered one man in most situations, and who knows how many of them could have escaped while the guy was in the other room? i dont recall whether he even had a gun, it may have "only" been a knife. it was a hideous crime, and an absolutely stunning social commentary.

Yes, I heard about that one it is disturbing. The knife should honestly be scarier than a gun. Up close and personal the knife is a much quieter more efficient weapon. The gun gives away a lot of information when someone fires it, but the knife really doesn't.

Thats why its so important for fathers to be a part of their daughter life, and not to make princess's out of em. As soon as mom had to explain why daddy hurt so much from her jumping on top of daddy and hitting him in his privates.... I took that time to explain to her what a weapon that is against men and boys that aren't playing nice. (granted I told her to start with the shins on little boys before going for the stones.) Hopefully, my little girl will continue to be a tough little cookie and never ever have to deal with creeps like that.

Not after this story.

Nope. Sure you could tell me till you are blue in the face about left wing this or right wing that, and neither of us would ever listen to eachother, but atleast we can all agree the most important story on NV today is "Woman Bites off Rapist's Penis"

Nope this story is highly rated and well enjoyed.

davinci; whats your obsession for being here?

Thank goodness this is one rookie that will never be advancing to the big leagues !=(

well said! lol

Having no experience at rape , I would still think I would not allow myself to be in such a position to have my Melvin bit off.

In the US trying to force a woman to perform oral sex is usually labeled as "forcible sodomy" or some such, rather than being called rape, but the intent is basically the same. Don't know about Italian law.

Now all the ones who want to go after Bush and Cheney for waterboarding known terrorists.

Is that like a misplaced modifier or something? I have no idea what you just said.

First of all, Yes I believe the story this "gal" is saying, because in order for a human to bite someone it takes a serious amount of duress. Could this woman be deranged? Maybe maybe thats whats causing her to be all messed up, but More likely, she was being taken advantage of, and finaly got the courage to fight back.

Did you read the article?

Next, you say you have no experience at rape. well thats great news. Lets say you are a rapist, how did you get there? Did you all the sudden just decide, I am the stronger of the sexes, and I am going to get my $%^& wet tonight whether she likes it or not? No, at some point, something bad enough or enough terrible things piled up and the normal part of you snapped, and you somehow either lost your ability to rationalize or you have found a way to rationalize rape. At this point, you may not rationalize the danger your melvin is in, or you may rationalize your melvin is in no danger due to your superiority.

Thirdly, are we anything more than terrorists if we label a people "terrorists" and decide the rule of law does not apply to them? How about you take that to another forum?

You have demonstrated rationalization of trolling in this forum, or you have lost the ability to rationalize that trolling is not ok.

Thats a bad sign.

What if it is not rape as she claims and she is the sicko and she bit his manihood off ?

You would have to admit biting his cock off is a pretty rough form of torture. As bad as the act or rape is I say it pales to the acts of these terrorists. These terrorists are an enemy unlike any other we have faced. My comparison is its amazing how people are for one kind of punishment but not another. Thank You very much

What if it is not rape as she claims and she is the sicko and she bit his manihood off ?

Your "What if" scenario is not presently supported by this article.

If indeed, it comes to pass that this woman is a sick weenie biter, and that this man was a poor hapless victim, I will with the same furvor battle anyone who says he deserved it. For whatever reason they justify why its ok for women to randomly bite off mens genitalia (and seriously I am not baiting anyone here....) I will brow beat them into obscurity if that is what infact it takes.

I suggest a brief reading on the use of comas, for your statements take quite a bit of re-reading.

If it turns out that the weenie biting was indeed meant as a torture from a ravenous vixen succubus (i really am not trying to bait anyone here) it would indeed be heinous in nature, and would be comparative to how heinous I have observed the Bush administration to be, I would not throw her in The Hague as I would have for Dubya (mostly cheney tho) but I would in this case push for the death penalty(As I also advocate the torturous death of rapists, as Im not such a big fan of the 8th ammendment).

A terrorist is someone who uses fear to influence or control a population. You are trying to scare me into thinking its ok to be lax on civil liberties in the name of hunting these "Bad Guys" who want to "kill me". Stop watching action movies and start watching national geographic.

Al qaeda is not so much different from the meth amphetamine problems we have in our own midwest, these people live a @!$%# life, and turn to what on the outside seems to be a glorious alternative to a mundane and possibly tormented existence. Most of these "terrorists" would be "meth heads" if they lived in Iowa, and you'd feel sorry for them, because globalization has taken away from their families ability to support itself, and have turned to meth, which could be taken as a suicide (martyrdom) or a war (against the mainstream).

you dont want to mess with me son, go post somewhere else.... I will spin you like the socialist version of Sean Hannity.

Your comparison is false in nature. We're talking about apples and oranges here. Labeling a group of people terrorists give you no right to torturously interogate them on the basis of religion and skin color, a man forcing sodomy on a woman is a green light for the woman to attack the man, and bite his penis off if he's trying to shove it down her throat.

You say "look at you libruls, you're all for beating up on this guy but not 'the terrorists' your hippotamusocrits or something, this is amurka be amurken"

You thought this was your opportunity to call liberals hypocrites, since you so often hear your fellow conservative accused of hypocrasy, you just could wait to turn it 'round on one a them libruls. well you kinda failed.

There is not a hypocrisy in delighting in a rapist being tortured, and wanting our military to uphold a level of decency when dealing with POW's or enemy combatants, however we call it. There is just no comparison. You are talking about people who see no lawyer, no red cross, vs people who have to go trhough the legal system, because a grand jury conveined and said there was enough evidence to go to trial. There is a sea of difference, but its just not striking you. You just thought you had an inside punch at the liberal rib cage, but I am Ali, and I tricked you foo', you saw the opening I left, and when you went fo' it, POW, right in the kissa.

If she is a sick weenie-biter, would she be labeled a johnsonphile or a peniphile? =-)

BTW, Eddie, I think you thought like a butterfly and stung like a bee too!

This is turnin into a thrilla on vinezilla with a gorrilla ;)

Also, the passage is meant to read in the voice of Gil Scot Heron played to the music of "The Revolution will not be televised"

Thats why I had to keep saying I wasnt baiting, because I needed words that fit my rhythym.

You would have to admit biting his cock off is a pretty rough form of torture. As bad as the act or rape is I say it pales to the acts of these terrorists. These terrorists are an enemy unlike any other we have faced.

So, you think there are going to be squads of female terrorists coming into the country to bite off men's penises?

Do you believe this gals story ?

Look at it from another perspective. Lets say you are single, and for that matter male (i assume you are by your objection to penis biting, but your name is not so telling). Lets say you meet a woman at a club and she is a drop dead gorgeous brunette. She invites you to her place for a night cap (wink wink) and you are totally stoked because you are totally gonna get some! Well lets say she likes to play rough, and handcuffs you to the bed, your apprehensive, but you go with it, because this lady is hot and your ready to go, then once she has you cuffed to the bed, she professes her liberal ideology, and your stiff is deflated, you want to get out of there, but she wont let you, she is holding you down while you are cuffed.

Do you bite?

Eddie

HaHa that ain't going to happen. If she would let herself be handcuffed then it ain't rape.

WILD-

In Eddie's scenario, YOU would be handcuffed.

Eddie has let his imagination get the best of him. If a gal would allow herself to be handcuffed then there would be no rape. His example is ridiculous

Actually, Wild, I would argue that point with you. A woman can change her mind at any time. She could agree to the handcuffing and then dislike something that came after. No means no at any point in the proceedings whether she voluntarily put the handcuffs on or not.

This is why if you're gonna just have sex with whoever... you can't get into the crazy stuff like handcuffs and bondage... cuz that person might be crazy once you start into that, then if you say no and they don't accept... well... what are you gonna do about it? lol personally I'd wanna know the person a little better before I was completely without control.

No means no at any point in the proceedings whether she voluntarily put the handcuffs on or not.

Rachel, you are certainly right on that point. just because the beginning of the sex was ok... doesn't mean it ends ok. If I'm get frisky with someone then all of a sudden she pulls out a cattle prod and wants to zap me with it.... all of a sudden... that's a NO. lol

On the other hand... when a dude invites you over to his house for drinks... wake up and smell the booty call!

ruthless, you made me laugh my patootie off at the image of the cattle prod. That would definitely be unusual.

I agree about knowing what's up when going to someone's house for drinks. I just had to argue the point with Wild that being more adventurous sexually automatically means rape is an impossibility. Which I don't need to repeat to you since you already agreed with me... Sorry for the repetition. :)

It's ok rachel, it's ok, I understand, it's ok, not everyone can see the truth for it's ok what it is..... it's ok.

being more adventurous sexually automatically means rape is an impossibility.

Have you been to the interwebs laltely??? lol me and my wife......... *ahem*....... PEOPLE are into some crazy stuff these days! doesn't mean they always want it from everyone. Some might... but they ALL don't. lol

wow. Does anyone know what reading comprehension is? I do. I think there was a lack of it when making the response.

I was trying to put the terms in a perspective you would understand, but I gues your sex deprived, and would take handcuffed freaky sex, even from a liberal.

You're so far off base, No means no, at whatever point. like some of the above mentioned. btw the cattle prod example was also well done. If a woman allows herself to be handcuffed, then changes her mind, if you continue, its a rape bro, and you're going to jail. Pay attention, because it may save your anal virginity some day. (they dont treat rapists very nicely in prison)

who are you argueing with? and why do you keep changing the point you're making? rachel and I are syaing that no means no at any point... then you come along, tell us we're dumb and that no means no at any point.

I'm confused.... bro.

Yes, I am following the convo, As much as I am trying to retain what I am reading he is confusing me also. Some people love to argue and must choke their opinions and thoughts down the throats of those who differ from the point they feel pressed to make. Perhaps we just don't care to comprehend ....instead of what Eddie has suggested that none of us can comprehend which is on the verge of calling someone dull ?

wow... interesting. Yes I do love a good argument, but if you scroll up, its pretty plain to see I was arguing with wildwonderful, and I was here first! So I didnt "just show up". You guys came in and actually backed me up when wildwonderfull didnt get the point I was making.

I never changed the point I am making. I am simply changed the perspective, to try to more clearly illustrate to this person, who actually is someone who is arguing for the sake of argument, that no means no, even mid coitus.

His lack of comprehension, allowed him to somehow think my initial example involved a girl allowing herself to be handcuffed, when, at no time does it go in that direction, it is infact the exact opposite, and that leads me to believe the man has a pea sized brain suitable only for Racism and nascar at best.

Ruthless/Kim, i believe we are in agreement with regards to our opinions on the subject of this article, in summation, no means no, even if she follows you to your apartment and goes halfway round the bases, but cuts you off before you get to home plate. That the woman was in the right to defend herself. And that wildwonderful is a troll and needs some education on the subject of what is and what is not a rape situation.

Maybe I should have italicized liberal for some emphasis to try to illustrate that i was using it in the insulting vernacular of the GOP an trying to appeal to his "sensibilities" in order to get him to even read what I wrote. Hope this clears up and issues. I could see how my statement about reading comprehension could be taken as a generality of posters above, but what it did was keep my statement clean from"direct personal attack" which is a CoH violation. I thought it was clear from the responses of who was and who is comprehending the subject matter. With a total of 5 posters other than myself, I believe 4/5 understood while one single person did not. Whether that was on purpose to try and distract from what I said or because that person is incredibly stupid is beyond me to say.

EFNJ

Oh man dude... that was way too long lol.... but I'm glad we cleared that up.

Also, I just realized how funny your name is lol My wife is also from jersey.

Long?!?! Ha, you aint seen liberal diatribe till you seen a full blown Eddie from joisey fughettaboutit rant!

I find little more statisfying than reading my own words in print!

I assume your wife is from the good part of jersey? Thats what we tell everyone, regardless of what city we are from.

Ha, you aint seen liberal diatribe till you seen a full blown Eddie from joisey fughettaboutit rant

I'm not sure I would survive through a diatribe of any kind lol

Goodness I hope so!.... she's not automatically a jerk to everyone... so that's a good start lol... every once in a while that accent slips out... and I just stare at her and she busts out laughing... "I can't help it, I'm from jersey!" haha

cawfee cautah wautah

coffee quarter water

my daughter gives me boatloads of crap for those three.

My wife jersey's out the most with sauce