Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit cartooncat's column >>

CARTOONCAT

Articles Posted: 33  Links Seeded: 12424
Member Since: 2/2007  Last Seen: 5/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Woolly mammoth to be brought back to life from cloned bone marrow 'within five years'

Seeded on Sat Dec 3, 2011 3:41 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: the Mail online
science
Seeded by cartooncat
Advertise | AdChoices

Scientists believe it may be possible to clone a woolly mammoth within five years after finding well-preserved bone marrow in a thigh bone recovered from permafrost soil in Siberia.

Teams from Russia's Sakha Republic's mammoth museum and Japan's Kinki University will launch fully-fledged joint research next year aiming to recreate the giant mammal, Japan's Kyodo News reported from Yakutsk, Russia.

By replacing the nuclei of egg cells from an elephant with those taken from the mammoth's marrow cells, embryos with mammoth DNA can be produced, Kyodo said, citing the researchers.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • cartooncat's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: London
  • Public Discussion (82)
El Draque

Hmmm. Sounds very promising and very interesting as well. However, Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer(what this is talking about as well as how Dolly was cloned) often leads to less than healthy animals which should be interesting to see if this actually happens...(The DNA cannot be degraded much...)

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 4:53 PM EST
Oiled Pelican

A less healthy "wholly mammoth"? Than an extinct one? Hmmm.... boggles the mind.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:56 PM EST
Arieus

Jurassic Park in the making. Sounds exciting, but the day will come when dinosaurs will roam and rule the planet once again, and we will be their appetizers, desserts and main course meals.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:58 PM EST
Arkansas Gloria

But then, maybe it is our turn to go extinct next- so...

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:42 PM EST
RaisedByWolves

I'm all for saber-toothed cats next!

  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:52 PM EST
Door King

harder to find them frozen into the tundra.

  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:28 PM EST
Abby.


I'm all for saber-toothed cats next!

YAY!!!
:D

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 12:51 AM EST
gmross

Here kitty, kitty, kitty.

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 1:10 AM EST
Arkansas Gloria

RaisedByWolves: I think wolves like to hunt many animals, does this include the CAT family? LOL.

I'm all for saber-toothed cats next!

  • 4 votes
#1.8 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:20 AM EST
RaisedByWolves

LOL, I love my kitties! YUM YUM YUM I was mostly thinking that few people will feel the wrath of the Jurassic Park mentality with the cloning of a woolly mammoth; but, the saber-tooth cat is able to destroy the lab and this idiocy with it!

  • 6 votes
#1.9 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 9:22 AM EST
Michael in S J

I'm all for saber-toothed cats next!

Well, there is that possibility as they both lived during the same time period. I am guessing of all of the STT bones they have pulled out of the La Brea Tar Pits, there must be some DNA left.

Unfortunately, STT didn't live in the northern climes the Wooly Mammoths did, so we won't find any frozen DNA.

  • 2 votes
#1.10 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 2:48 PM EST
RaisedByWolves

No woolly mammoths at The Brea Pits, but mammoth and STTs were both there. I wonder if that dip in a petroleum pool saved the DNA? And I'm serious about that question because my life sciences classes were so basic and so long ago...

  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 1:44 PM EST
Reply
backroads

I can tell you they're a mess to clean up after and they eat a ton of hay.

  • 10 votes
Reply#2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 5:05 PM EST
There They Go Again

Oh yes indeed. Did you ever see the elephant habitat at the San Diego Zoo? My wife just stood there fascinated as the pile of dung behind one of them grew and grew. Finally, she turned to me when it was about four feet high and said, "Isn't it ever going to stop?"

Ought to be a very interesting result.

  • 7 votes
#2.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:37 PM EST
Arieus

-but can't they turn all that Mammoth dung into cleaner, useful energy.

  • 4 votes
#2.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:07 PM EST
Arkansas Gloria

Anyone see the article I put up at THE INVISIBLE ROADSIDE GARDEN, on the bio-fueled truck? This would provide a LOT of bio-fuel.... http://gtodd52.newsvine.com/_news/2011/11/13/8784684-green-transportation

  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:46 PM EST
backroads

A few years ago, we tried to clone a wooly bully. Something went terribly wrong and we ended up with a bird with the word.

  • 6 votes
#2.4 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:22 PM EST
There They Go Again

Is that where Big Bird came from backroads? I've always wondered.

  • 4 votes
#2.5 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:43 PM EST
greck

A few years ago, we tried to clone a wooly bully. Something went terribly wrong and we ended up with a bird with the word.

Interesting,

I hadn't heard about the bird.

apparently Matty told Hatty, but nobody told me.

  • 1 vote
#2.6 - Tue Dec 6, 2011 2:17 PM EST
RaisedByWolves

Well, The Bird is the Word, but I prefer the Woolly Bully!

    #2.7 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 1:44 PM EST
    Reply
    Z1P2

    Why do I think they'll end up cloning bacteria that would have surely moved in during decomposition?

    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 5:27 PM EST
    SimplexiT

    They're taking the first steps towards a real Jurassic Park! Awesome!

    (cue epic theme song)

    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 5:49 PM EST
    kaviaq

    Right, the mammoth will just LOVE global warming.......

    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 5:52 PM EST
    hotlink

    They can be sheared!

    • 3 votes
    #5.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:17 PM EST
    kaviaq

    LOL NAKED "Not so Wooly" mammoth!!! Ummm, wouldn't that be an elephant?!

    • 6 votes
    #5.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:19 PM EST
    Arieus

    Right, the mammoth will just LOVE global warming.......

    but the barber shops will love all the business...

    lol

    • 5 votes
    #5.3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:27 PM EST
    Shuklack

    Meanwhile - the United Sheep and Wool Producers lobby begins to speak out against this scientific endeavor.

      #5.4 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 12:36 PM EST
      Reply
      Dani-976192

      The question is: Why? What purpose would a woolly mammoth serve today? Will they be farmed for their meat or fur?

      • 3 votes
      #6 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 5:59 PM EST
      hotlink

      Yes!

      • 3 votes
      #6.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:17 PM EST
      kaviaq

      Hey...leave those mammoth alone!

      • 3 votes
      #6.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:19 PM EST
      Arkansas Gloria

      Well, since horsemeat is now on the table... Actually, early man hunted those Mammoths, with spears, and they were food. However, I doubt we would use ALL of the animal, and would waste much...

      • 4 votes
      #6.3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:48 PM EST
      kaviaq

      How about beans? Everyone likes beans.

      • 2 votes
      #6.4 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:01 PM EST
      There They Go Again

      Yum. Mammoth and beans. Should work just like the beef and beans eaten so much in the old west (for a demonstration of how well that worked, see the campfire scene in Blazing Saddles).

      • 9 votes
      #6.5 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:10 PM EST
      Arieus

      The question is: Why? What purpose would a woolly mammoth serve today? Will they be farmed for their meat or fur?

      The real purpose in doing this is to actually try and find out how they behaved and survived. Other than that, these people that are now playing god will one day regret creating a beast such as this that will cost a fortune to accommodate and to feed. So raise then, kill them, and then feed them to the human savages if the wooly Mammoth refuses to behave.

      One Mammoth burger and a large order of saber tooth tiger fires on the side, and one large coconut drink.

      • 5 votes
      #6.6 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:34 PM EST
      Adler315

      Woolly Mammoth Fart Levels Kinki University and Areas of Higashi-Osaka District: Film at 11.

      • 4 votes
      #6.7 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:38 PM EST
      Dani-976192

      But, in order to discover how woolly mammoths behaved and survived, wouldn't they need to be in their original environment?

      • 4 votes
      #6.8 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 12:06 AM EST
      Arkansas Gloria

      Read Jean Auel's books on THE EARTH CHILDREN SERIES., etc. She did heavy research before writing the series.

      • 4 votes
      #6.9 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:23 AM EST
      Dani-976192

      I love those books! My point, however, is that scientists wouldn't be getting a completely accurate idea of mammoth behavior in our world- because it is so different from the time of the mammoths.

      • 2 votes
      #6.10 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 8:22 AM EST
      shepherd0886

      Excellent and valid point Dani. Curiosity is a wonderful thing but sometimes it can be carried to extremes. LOL The real question is "of what value would any of their findings have for our present day society and flora and fauna?" As you point out when taken out of context it probably would not be relevant.

      • 2 votes
      #6.11 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 10:41 AM EST
      FlNutmegger

      I wonder just how many times man, in his ignorance, fooled around with Mother Nature only to have his actions come back and bought him in the butt?

      • 6 votes
      #6.12 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 10:53 AM EST
      shepherd0886

      FINutmegger my guess would be 'almost every time.' LOL In the universe everything requires balance. When ever we tinker with something we invariably create some kind of an imbalance. That ultimately has adverse effects that may not show up for many years. Humans are very short sighted.

      For example our concept of using dams for irrigation and flood control seemed to be very logical and beneficial. However no one considered the long term effects such as salinization of the soil from too much irrigation and loss of fish population because of messing up the migratory habits of the fish when spawning. I am not saying that we should never try to improve things but I do suggest that some thought be put into our efforts with a very strong consideration of the natural balance of all things involved.

      In the game of poker sometimes you have to just take the risk because you have become 'pot committed.' Similarly once we have committed to a particular evolutionary direction in our society we must then follow through with it or it has all been a waste of time and money. In this case the die was cast for this creature long ago and I can see no long term benefits of resurrecting it as a living species again.

      • 4 votes
      #6.13 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 11:46 AM EST
      FlNutmegger

      I am not saying that we should never try to improve things but I do suggest that some thought be put into our efforts with a very strong consideration of the natural balance of all things involved.

      Spot on! Whenever I think about our unnatural impositions upon nature I invariably think of the Peruvian Incas and their hundreds of years old irrigation system, and aqueducts, somehow designed and built as a complement to nature and still in effective use today.

      • 3 votes
      #6.14 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 12:52 PM EST
      RaisedByWolves

      We are so short-sighted most of the time, FIN. First Nations have a philosophy of adopting some program or law only after considering how it affects 7 generations!

      • 3 votes
      #6.15 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 6:37 PM EST
      Shuklack

      I wonder just how many times man, in his ignorance, fooled around with Mother Nature only to have his actions come back and bought him in the butt?

      Counting or not counting Twilight Zone episodes?

      • 1 vote
      #6.16 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 12:38 PM EST
      Michael in S J

      Well, since horsemeat is now on the table...

      Horse meat has ALWAYS been on the table, it's just that in the U.S. horses are cute pets and you don't eat pets. Europe, different story!

      • 3 votes
      #6.17 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 2:53 PM EST
      Reply
      Reliant

      Hey, I will pay to go to the Zoo that has a Woolly Mammoth. But they better have lots of solar panels at that zoo, the Mammoth is going to need a very big refrigerated cage.

      • 5 votes
      Reply#7 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:06 PM EST
      Jeff in Houston

      And will promptly file for candidacy for President of the United States.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#8 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:07 PM EST
      jamithy1

      I'm not saying they shouldn't but do these people ever stop to consider that species go extinct because nature chooses for them to? obviously not including the species that have gone extinct because of mans selfish destruction.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#9 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:07 PM EST
      hotlink

      Man is a part of nature.

      • 1 vote
      #9.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:18 PM EST
      jamithy1

      yes but you know what i meant. I meant not due to sport hunting as opposed to hunting for food etc

      • 1 vote
      #9.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:40 PM EST
      Uthaclena

      There is some evidence that humans may have been responsible to mammoth's extinction in the first place; maybe we can UNdo some of the damage we've done...

      • 5 votes
      #9.3 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:22 PM EST
      jamithy1

      good point

      • 1 vote
      #9.4 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:28 PM EST
      There They Go Again

      I meant not due to sport hunting as opposed to hunting for food etc

      It may interest you to know that sport hunting has never caused the extinction of any species.

      • 1 vote
      #9.5 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:22 PM EST
      Abby.

      Ummm......what about the Thylacine?
      (Tasmanian Tiger)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thylacine

      • 3 votes
      #9.6 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:38 PM EST
      There They Go Again

      Not sport hunting Abby. They were, like the Wolf, considered a pest and a danger to cattle. The difference is that mostly the Wolves were poisoned off rather than shot.

      • 1 vote
      #9.7 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:59 PM EST
      Abby.

      But it was MAN that killed them off, in their own habitat.
      Humans have a lot to answer for.
      :(

      • 3 votes
      #9.8 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 12:54 AM EST
      There They Go Again

      Abby, the question was strictly confined to sport hunting, which is heavily regulated to ensure that extinctions don't happen. Whether we should kill off competitors for our food supply or those species that are otherwise dangerous to humans is an entirely different question, which may have a completely different answer.

      • 2 votes
      #9.9 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:13 PM EST
      Shuklack

      Modern hunting is very responsible... when there is responsible oversight at least. Hunters are some of the staunchest conservationists.

      But in days past, things have indeed been overhunted to extinction/near extinction. The buffalo is an obvious one. Dodo birds as well. It's when you combine our arrogance, with a disrespect for the land - that you get things like this.

      Real hunters have nothing but respect for the land that supports them, it's the posers and trophy hunters who are the problem.

      • 1 vote
      #9.10 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 12:43 PM EST
      There They Go Again

      But in days past, things have indeed been overhunted to extinction/near extinction. The buffalo is an obvious one. Dodo birds as well.

      But Shuklack, those too were not sport hunting. That was commercial hunting for meat and hides. Sport hunters were among those who put a stop to it.

        #9.11 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 1:32 PM EST
        Reply
        Kavika

        Great article, it will be interesting to see if they actually do it.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#10 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:26 PM EST
        FlNutmegger

        I'll wait.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#11 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 6:29 PM EST
        Abby.

        Me too.

        • 3 votes
        #11.1 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:32 PM EST
        Reply
        Arkansas Gloria

        Good article, by the way!

        • 1 vote
        Reply#12 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 7:49 PM EST
        shepherd0886

        I can sort of understand the curiosity factor and wanting to study one of these creatures in a live scenario but I can see no earthly reason to resurect a breeding population of these animals. After all they thrived from about the middle to the end of the last ice age as I understand it so our climate today would most likely be unhospitable to them. Also they consume massive amounts of vegetation as do modern elephants and other large herbivores and they are already facing some serious habitat problems in their native environs so this creature would have a real difficult time competing for food sources unless they were fed by their keepers.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#13 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:18 PM EST
        ivorybill

        Your exactly right and at the same time, exactly wrong. The same curiosity study could be said of the evasive, distructive, and over consuming being, mankind!

        • 2 votes
        #13.1 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:19 PM EST
        There They Go Again

        The same curiosity study could be said of the evasive, distructive, and over consuming being, mankind!

        Ivorybill,

        That same study is being done regarding humans and it's pretty far advanced. It's called Behavioral Psychology.

        • 1 vote
        #13.2 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:37 PM EST
        Reply
        WatcherInTheShadows

        Kewl. I want to see one. :)

        • 3 votes
        Reply#14 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 8:45 PM EST
        ivorybill

        Extinction is like ignorance: It does'nt last forever, but a humans life span does'nt either. To view what once was we used to just go to books, yet now we are at an age where our cognitive abilities advance to more common sense than our social structures addictions to consume the rest of Earth do. Bringing back or saving any species from temporary extinction is an improvement over our obvious dereliction to our once ignorant thoughts as to what domnion over should mean in regards to all other life on Earth. Seven billion of us, with seven billion dreams of prosperity, but science shows the reality to our preservation is in relation to the bio-diversity richness of all Earth. Go to a small town library and try and research an advanced subject and you will find the place somewhat lacking of complete knowledge. That is the situation we have exploited this wonderful Earth to. The Great Library is getting hometown small and all knowledge we have derived thus for was given from the main branch library we are still demolishing and replacing with a man made facsimile of what we will surely miss one day.

          Reply#15 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 2:01 PM EST
          Dai Wills

          I don't think that reserrecting extinct animals is really the way forward when we have so many animals currently starring extinction in the face, why can't we direct our scientific efforts towards preserving what is currently living on our planet?

          • 3 votes
          Reply#16 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 6:22 PM EST
          FlNutmegger

          This is purely for the bragging rights that they did it (who ever they happen to be this time). Sorry scientific intellectual types but this is DUMB!

          • 4 votes
          Reply#17 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 6:26 PM EST
          shepherd0886

          It is my personal belief that everything in life and in nature happens for a reason. I won't delve further into that because it would cause this thread to descend into one of those circular arguments/discussions about theology. So I will simply leave it at that. Given my beliefs then it makes sense that past extinctions were meant to happen and that even those creatures on the edge of extinction today are perhaps meant to go. It is just their time and the evolution of our environment has made their continued existence less possible.

          Now I understand and appreciate our well meaning considerations when it comes to trying to save this species or that from extinction but at the same time I question whether such considerations are worth the time and effort since, in most cases, the given species will most likely disappear anyway despite our most heroic efforts. Please understand that I am not talking about the willful destruction of a normally successful species capable of flourishing on its own such as the whale population. Once we regulated their hunting that species has managed quite nicely on its own and has come back to the point of being removed from the endangered list and put on the protected list. This recovery required nothing more from us than to simply stop killing them in huge numbers. Kind of reminds one of the American bison and its brush with extinction in the 19th century.

          So any effort to resurrect the wooly mammoth would, in my humble opinion, be nothing more than a curiosity for curiosity's sake and would have no real meaning as it regards trying to restore this species to a self sustainable level. In any case these scientists will do what they think that they must and the fall out will simply land where it will. Who would have imagined that Frankenstein would someday really exist? LOL Lets just hope that they don't create a monster. :=))

          • 2 votes
          Reply#18 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 7:24 PM EST
          FlNutmegger

          shepherd0886:, Well said and on the mark too IMO! There is a reason for all actions and activities on the earth and man in his ignorance simply fails to either understand, or see, that some of his actions, to satisfy his "curiosity", are dangerous to us, as a species, in the animal kingdom, beyond measure. Your analogy to Frankenstein is truly on the money.

          • 3 votes
          #18.1 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 7:45 PM EST
          anonymous-1077600

          Anyone for frankenwool?

          • 2 votes
          #18.2 - Sun Dec 4, 2011 10:19 PM EST
          ivorybill

          Well...that same theory could apply to our abilities to bring something back, that before was not cognitively possible, yet through time came possible. One day , I suspect we will be able to create life from scratch. From the dusts of Earth, and if that comes to light, then it could be said by some: it was meant to be.

          • 2 votes
          #18.3 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 6:21 PM EST
          Reply
          Revolver_Grey

          So... how much longer until we start digging up loved ones and resurrecting them? You know we would. It would be a half-assed reincarnation, right?

          • 1 vote
          Reply#19 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 12:54 PM EST
          ivorybill

          That's a good question...........just "What" are the limits that were genectically induced by evolution, and or were limited by a devine sorce???........Time will answer, that, and many more questions we ponder now.

          • 1 vote
          #19.1 - Tue Dec 6, 2011 1:45 PM EST
          gmross

          According to the current law, never.

            #19.2 - Tue Dec 6, 2011 2:43 PM EST
            Reply
            iz gots a ?

            hmmm. i feel like poaching is about to get a lot more interesting unfortunately :(

              Reply#20 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 1:10 PM EST
              FlNutmegger

              Unleash your imagination here and consider 75,000,000 of these animals roaming freely and living in concert with the Indians of the times who knew exactly what they were doing in maintaining that balance between man and nature. Then along came those who knew about genocide since they were already practicing it on the native people and figure just how much empathy they must have felt for an animal. They were guilty of killing for no more that the skins and leaving the carcasses to rot. This carnage continued until there were less than a thousand (800) left. Check just the numbers 75,000,000 down to 800. Now isn't that special.

              http://tinyurl.com/6oa5msh

              Before white settlers began to push into the vast west in any great numbers, an estimated 75 million buffalo freely roamed upon the Great Plains. American Indians hunted them for food and other necessities, and a harmonious ebb and flow between man and beast prevailed.

              “Let them kill, skin, and sell until the buffalo is exterminated, as it is the only way to bring lasting peace and allow civilization to advance."

              - General Philip Sheridan

                Reply#21 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 2:13 PM EST
                ivorybill

                Yhea...and people make Buffalo Bill into some sort of hero....when in reality, he was a butcher. We call our way of life, civilization, yet to all others in Nature, our 7 billion, we must surely appear as if we are a desease.

                • 2 votes
                #21.1 - Tue Dec 6, 2011 1:48 PM EST
                Reply
                Kearney Outlaw

                Oh, yeah. Oooh, ahhh, that's how it always starts. Then later there's running and screaming.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#22 - Mon Dec 5, 2011 2:54 PM EST
                greck

                my grandpa used to say:

                "I bet them mammoths was good eatin'"

                I'll let you know when I get to heaven, grandpa.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#23 - Tue Dec 6, 2011 2:19 PM EST
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                FUN STUFF:
                • Leaderboard |
                • E-Mail Alerts |
                • Top of the Vine |
                • Newsvine Live |
                • Newsvine Archives |
                • The Greenhouse |
                COMPANY STUFF:
                • Code of Honor |
                • Company Info |
                • Contact Us |
                • Jobs |
                • User Agreement |
                • Privacy Policy |
                • About our ads
                LEGAL STUFF:
                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com